But that's a larger issue. Within the YDN, I often see evidence of some part of this institutional character, particularly the part that involves being completely divorced from other realities. Yesterday, I couldn't quite believe the opening of this opinion column recommending IUDs as birth control. On the whole, the article is fine, in a minimally well-informed way -- the author is trying to be informative about a birth control option that women should know about. But check out the first lines:
"You should probably take two Tylenol beforehand," my gynecologist advised me.
"What about codeine?" I asked.
"Well, codeine won’t make you feel less pain," she said. “It’ll just make you not care about the pain.”
Two hours before the appointment I gulped down three tablespoons of liquid codeine. Ultimately, I still cared about the pain.
From a literary standpoint, that's a great opener -- pulls the reader in (Why would you need Tylenol?), includes an apt and amusing observation, repeats a strong phrase with a meaningful difference ("care about the pain").
From a self-awareness standpoint, WHOA.
(1) Your doctor said "mild over-the-counter analgesic" and you jumped to "opiate-derived class-II narcotic." That's about you, lady, not about a drawbacks of IUDs.
(2) Where did you get the codeine? Because it doesn't sound like it was prescribed to you. If you're going to infer the existence of a functioning underground campus drug trade, or even describe the intentional off-label use of a controlled substance, you might want to make that a point of analysis in your writing.
God, I love this place sometimes. From wall-throwing ironic distance, sure. But we must take love where we can get it.